Anti-copyright legislation has become a hot topic worldwide for quite a while now. ACTA is among the many international agreements aiming to control all of the information available on the Internet, giving copyright holders the power to ban websites that they feel are reproducing illegally copied content. In the last couple of weeks, however, ACTA has attracted quite a huge amount of attention, largely because of its plans to impose fines on individuals who share the pirated articles online. However, the true question you must ask oneself is: why are thousands of Europeans mad with ACTA?
The truth is, ACTA is not ideal by any means. For instance, many believe that the agreement does not go far enough, allowing for censorship of several kinds of address on the web. Also, many are concerned that ACTA doesn’t go far enough in making certain that copyright infringement lawsuits can be filed against those people who have been accused of piracy. Many other men and women will also be annoyed that ACTA fails to protect against fake merchandise and services, or even the grey area that suddenly becomes obscure when an enterprising Internet surfer starts to market Counterfeit products and services. This concern about ACTA’s true effectiveness has prompted thousands of Europeans to beaming with anger in the whole situation.
The truth is, there is no need for the European Union to ratify acta. The European Union as a whole has many drawbacks and is mostly regarded as a failed project on the worldwide scale. Moreover, the whole notion of international copyright security is a bad one, as it basically amounts to censorship of the web, that is a bad thing on the planet. Because of this, it’s ridiculous for the EU to provide people such an obviously poor deal when there are plenty of better solutions available.
Secondly, the truth is that the EU has not yet even begun to discuss what it intends to do once ACTA was signed into law. If the US had ratified acta, then the exact same European Union could have instantly banned all US businesses from doing any business in the European continent. The Czech government, however, has insisted that there will be no restrictions at until the Czech Republic fully implements its own laws regarding ACTA. So, why did people protest against ratifying the acta treaty? Some people just needed the US to follow suit, although others have been concerned about the hazards of ACTA and how it would influence the international internet.
Last, let’s look at the true reason people were upset with ACTA. This is a very frequent complaint: that the US was attempting to dictate how global internet businesses should operate. The fact is that the US was trying to secure its own interests by incorporating some extra regulations into the already saturated global internet marketplace. ACTA is seen as a step towards limiting foreign companies from providing services to the EU. This, it’s claimed, is since some companies might provide some solutions which the EU doesn’t need, which is a gross exaggeration. In reality, the limitations on the supply of offshore applications and other offshore activities are only designed to safeguard intellectual property rights.
Thus, to answer our original question – why were there so many protests against ACTA anyway? – that the answer is clear. There are people who feel threatened by ACTA. And there are individuals who do not enjoy how the US is trying to micromanage the worldwide internet.